Sussex wrote:
So now we are being a little more reserved, you are talking about saloon vehicles being bought, not the vast majority of all vehicles. I'm also grateful for the information about badge holders, quite what they have got to do with your imaginary vast majority I know not.
Now maybe you could tell me how many taxis your manor license, and how many of them have drivers not paid a bean for, other than the necessary small fee from the council.
But I bet it's not a vast majority.

Sussex you are a complete waste of time, I have offered statistics about my borough on more than one occasion, you just choose to ignore the [edited by admin] when it doesn't suit your argument.
The simple fact of the matter is that you cannot accept that allowing "market forces" to dictate taxi numbers is detrimental to the trade on the whole and derestriction allows further exploitation of the drivers.
The person who holds the most HC licenses in Gateshead is a PH operator.
The issue of quotas is simple to overcome, make it illegal to transfer a plate and only allow people who drive the vehicle to hold a licence.
You are providing an easy answer to a question that wasn't even asked, still I suppose you specialist taxi solicitor friend is making himself a tidy sum from those councils who he can scare into thinking they will be legally challenged if they don't form the policies he is warning them about. He knows that there will be a legal challenge cause he will make it on behalf of his local client. The only differance is that he will charge his client more so that he gets more when the court awards costs, so as a way of reducing costs to the council they should just pay him direct for his legal advice on how to derestrict.
And his friend, the specialist taxi solicitor is a member of this site, although he doesn't post under his real name, which I won't publish cause I'd get banned as well.
B. Lucky
