Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Don't shoot the messenger.
You make a good point. Thanks for passing that info on.

Indeed, but Brummers described it as a "very good reason", so I assumed he'd thought it through.
And indeed the credit crunch is perhaps a more relevant reason for some of the finance providers pulling out of the market.
I always thought that it looked a bit ropy financially. For example, I got a brand new £20k motor on HP and didn't pay a penny (no deposit) until I'd had it for a month. Even though they won't do this if somone has a bit credit rating, it always looked a bit too risky to me.
Also, the proviso in the consumer credit legislation (?) that allows a motor bought on HP to be returned after half the repayments wouldn't have made much financial sense either - an ex-taxi bought at £15k, say, with maybe 120,000 on the clock handed back after two-and-a-half years

Probably worth a couple of grand, yet still £7k plus outstanding on the agreement. Some people I know did that with several different cars, and the finance companies must have taken a big hit on all of them, yet the owners just went to another provider and got the same deal.
Of course, they'll have made money on most of the loans, but I suspect it was all just another aspect of the free and easy credit market, and that some kind of, er, realignment would be necessary in the long term, so the fact that quite a few of the finance companies have exited the market hardly seems a surprise.
An increase in repossessions doesn't seem any kind of compelling evidence either, in view of the economic climate.
Interesting also if they're saying that they won't loan using the vehicle as security in unrestricted areas while in apparently rock solid restricted areas you can't get a loan secured against the plate

when reading your comment.... it is obvious to see you have many views.... what is also obvious is that they are not based on practical experience....Always a bridesmaid but never the bride