Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 5:50 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
grandad wrote:
MR T wrote:
So it's your belief that if the fans without tickets apologise to the families that will make everything OK... it was the police's job to control the crowds... that is what they were there for...

Of course it won't make everything OK. But if the ticketless people had not been there the police would have had no trouble with control.
What, in your opinion, should the police have done on the day when faced by the many people, hell bent on getting into the ground without a ticket?
I am sure that with hindsight they may not have opened the gate but what would the consequenses have been then? Do you think that the croud outside would have dispersed quietly?

I am not a football supporter... and therefore do not know the corrects football terms regarding the stadium..... what I do know is what I have been listening to for the last 23 years....... the fans on mass came down to the gate ... that was not only for that part of the stadium but also the entrance to other parts.. it became a backlog.. there was practically no police.... to relieve that pressure the police open the gate.... the intention was for the fans to go either side where it was empty... but the police forgot to close the tunnel. so the fans went straight ahead... into the tunnel following the man in front.... that pen was already full... it held 1500 people..... and thousands more were let in..... people in the tunnel were collapsing, people outside of the tunnel were getting crushed.. they climbed up onto walls to get out of the crush...
All this was was made out to be drunken fans storming the gates.. that was not the case. yes fans go to matches without tickets and still do today ...but they go home afterwards

I think you were sold a line 23 years ago and you still believe it now. because not to believe would mean you were wrong.... I suggest you read the report

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Just like the reports 23 years ago Trevor, you didn't want to believe everything an enquiry 'finds'.

They 'find' what they want, especially when knighthoods and honours are floating about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
GBC wrote:
gusmac wrote:

Again, none of this justifies a cover up GBC.

The events had already happened and 96 lives were already lost. How were we to learn from this if the true facts are concealed?
This cover up served what purpose exactly? Apart from saving the careers, pensions, honours and reputations of some of the culpable?

What can you possibly offer to justify what amounts to a criminal conspiracy?




I'm not sure with all this publicity and coverage over the years it's been 'covered up' like watergate or something, I don't think there's any denial that it happened and people died.

My points had nothing to do with the allegations of one sided reporting or altered statements, I was referring to the almost reversal and now total blame on the emergency services, whens there's blame all round, including the fans.

I've been to many matches, I see with my own eyes what 'fans' are like at times. My dog behaves better than some fans.

Why didn't the ambulances go to the stadium..... I know why... because they were all dead at 3...15...... but now it seems 40-50 were still alive... don't you think that's a question that deserves an answer..

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
GBC wrote:
Just like the reports 23 years ago Trevor, you didn't want to believe everything an enquiry 'finds'.

They 'find' what they want, especially when knighthoods and honours are floating about.

this report simply lays out the facts as the documentation proves... as they have said the evidence speaks for itself..... you should read the report

http://hillsborough.independent.gov.uk/ ... report.pdf

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
As the severity of the disaster was becoming apparent, SYP Match Commander, Chief Superintendent David Duckenfield, told a falsehood to senior officials that Liverpool fans had broken into the stadium and caused an inrush into the central pens thus causing the fatal crush. While later discredited, this unfounded allegation was broadcast internationally and was the first explanation of the cause of the disaster to enter the public domain.• Within days, further serious allegations emerged from unnamed sources, a Police Federation spokesperson and a local Conservative MP, Irvine Patnick. These were that Liverpool fans had conspired to arrive late, many were without tickets, were exceptionally drunk and aggressive and determined to force entry into the stadium.• On 19 April, four days after the disaster, The Sun newspaper published a front-page story under the banner headline, ‘THE TRUTH’, alleging that Liverpool fans had assaulted and urinated on police officers resuscitating the dying, stolen from the dead and verbally sexually abused an unconscious young woman. Although less prominently, and often with a lesser degree of certainty, other regional and national newspapers published similar allegations.• In a letter revealed to the Panel, within days of The Sun’s article its Managing Editor wrote to people, including bereaved families, who had complained about the allegations. While regretting the presentation of the article, he refused to apologise for its ‘substance’, claiming it was factually accurate. Subsequently the coverage was condemned by the Press Council.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
MR T wrote:
GBC wrote:
gusmac wrote:

Again, none of this justifies a cover up GBC.

The events had already happened and 96 lives were already lost. How were we to learn from this if the true facts are concealed?
This cover up served what purpose exactly? Apart from saving the careers, pensions, honours and reputations of some of the culpable?

What can you possibly offer to justify what amounts to a criminal conspiracy?




I'm not sure with all this publicity and coverage over the years it's been 'covered up' like watergate or something, I don't think there's any denial that it happened and people died.

My points had nothing to do with the allegations of one sided reporting or altered statements, I was referring to the almost reversal and now total blame on the emergency services, whens there's blame all round, including the fans.

I've been to many matches, I see with my own eyes what 'fans' are like at times. My dog behaves better than some fans.

Why didn't the ambulances go to the stadium..... I know why... because they were all dead at 2...15...... but now it seems 40-50 were still alive... don't you think that's a question that deserves an answer..




Ambulances and the fire brigade will always have an RVP before entering any public order situation, thats still the case today.

Plus we're talking 1989 medical knowledge and equipment here, in 1989 literally no front line ambos carried a defibrillator , now you find them in tescos.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Quote:
Quote:
Ambulances and the fire brigade will always have an RVP before entering any public order situation, thats still the case today.

Plus we're talking 1989 medical knowledge and equipment here, in 1989 literally no front line ambos carried a defibrillator , now you find them in tescos.


The point is that the doctors involved in this report were of the opinion that with the equipment and knowledge the ambulance crews had at the time that those people had the chance of life... where they are not allowed in by the police??

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Public order situation: their safety, fans in the pitches safety, access to the pitch with exiting fans etc

Lots of valid reasons.

The same would happen today, Rvp and await instructions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
Cant believe some of the comments,there were lies corruption and cover ups and thats ok ? Have things really moved on that much ?Ian Tomlinson and another few spring to mind.Its not about the football people died and people lied about it,if it was someone close you lost you might feel different.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
I still cant believe 160 police officers altered notebooks and not 1 has admitted it and said why...

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
blackpool wrote:
Cant believe some of the comments,there were lies corruption and cover ups and thats ok ? Have things really moved on that much ?Ian Tomlinson and another few spring to mind.Its not about the football people died and people lied about it,if it was someone close you lost you might feel different.

I think there's now a general consensus that many people f***ed up on and before that day, which eventually led to those very sad needless deaths.

Loads of people are correctly pointing the fingers at those in the establishment, but I'm also asking why those fighting the good fight never mention the appalling behaviour by some of the Liverpool fans before the game.

There appears to be a large dose of ignorance when it comes to their so-called own.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
Sussex wrote:
blackpool wrote:
Cant believe some of the comments,there were lies corruption and cover ups and thats ok ? Have things really moved on that much ?Ian Tomlinson and another few spring to mind.Its not about the football people died and people lied about it,if it was someone close you lost you might feel different.

I think there's now a general consensus that many people f***ed up on and before that day, which eventually led to those very sad needless deaths.

Loads of people are correctly pointing the fingers at those in the establishment, but I'm also asking why those fighting the good fight never mention the appalling behaviour by some of the Liverpool fans before the game.

There appears to be a large dose of ignorance when it comes to their so-called own.

Did you only read or hear the bits you wanted ? Or was i mistaken when the panel said ""The panel has quite simply found 'no evidence' in support of allegations of 'exceptional levels of drunkenness, ticketlessness or violence among Liverpool fans'; 'no evidence that fans had conspired to arrive late at the stadium'; and 'no evidence that they stole from the dead and dying'."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
blackpool wrote:
Did you only read or hear the bits you wanted ? Or was i mistaken when the panel said ""The panel has quite simply found 'no evidence' in support of allegations of 'exceptional levels of drunkenness, ticketlessness or violence among Liverpool fans'; 'no evidence that fans had conspired to arrive late at the stadium'; and 'no evidence that they stole from the dead and dying'."

How much evidence do they need to simply see that the ground was full and there were still thousands outside.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
grandad wrote:
blackpool wrote:
Did you only read or hear the bits you wanted ? Or was i mistaken when the panel said ""The panel has quite simply found 'no evidence' in support of allegations of 'exceptional levels of drunkenness, ticketlessness or violence among Liverpool fans'; 'no evidence that fans had conspired to arrive late at the stadium'; and 'no evidence that they stole from the dead and dying'."

How much evidence do they need to simply see that the ground was full and there were still thousands outside.

But the point being there was a disaster where people died,with no evidence of all the false allegations by the police.Was this not the same force that five or six years earlier had been involved with the miners strike and cover ups there ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
blackpool wrote:
But the point being there was a disaster where people died,with no evidence of all the false allegations by the police.Was this not the same force that five or six years earlier had been involved with the miners strike and cover ups there ?


People outside the ground didnt kill anyone.....how could they - they were outside the ground.

Of course, the people maybe crushed themselves - in the same manner as those who died on Bloody Sunday shot themselves, in the same manner that those accused of the Birmingham Pub Bombings beat themselves up before confessing.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 161 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 228 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group