gusmac wrote:
Again, none of this justifies a cover up GBC.
The events had already happened and 96 lives were already lost. How were we to learn from this if the true facts are concealed?
This cover up served what purpose exactly? Apart from saving the careers, pensions, honours and reputations of some of the culpable?
What can you possibly offer to justify what amounts to a criminal conspiracy?
I'm not sure with all this publicity and coverage over the years it's been 'covered up' like watergate or something, I don't think there's any denial that it happened and people died.
My points had nothing to do with the allegations of one sided reporting or altered statements, I was referring to the almost reversal and now total blame on the emergency services, whens there's blame all round, including the fans.
I've been to many matches, I see with my own eyes what 'fans' are like at times. My dog behaves better than some fans.
Why didn't the ambulances go to the stadium..... I know why... because they were all dead at 3...15...... but now it seems 40-50 were still alive... don't you think that's a question that deserves an answer..