Jasbar wrote:
1. Politics has no separate thread. When you make comment, it is legitimate for the political aspects to be discussed at that point.
Every thread has a subject, and it is legitimate for posters to at least try to stick to the point, rather than to wander off topic for their own reasons.
This one is about a murder trial with one driver dead and another looking at a life sentence. You chose to use it to launch yet another attack on The SNP and some specific politicians.
Politics now has it's own separate section . Admin almost wrecked the forum creating it a few weeks ago.
You could have started a new thread there with your accusations. You did not and, to me, that says much about you.
Jasbar wrote:
2. I don't exclude Labour from the machinations of restriction. It is to their eternal shame that they sought to restrict the aspirations of workers. But the, Labour haven't represented workers for 30 years, ever since they realised they would have to dump worker interests and serve the interests of the capitalist class if they ever wanted to be elected. However, The Tories, particularly on Edinburgh's council, have always voted against restriction. To their singular credit.
Yes, wonderful people those Tories

Such an honest and upstanding bunch.
Jasbar wrote:
3. Don't care about Aberdeen. The point of Labour there is answered in 2 above. But I would say that Aberdeen didn't have the machinations of scumbag Cardownie to consider. A reprobate who jumped ship from Labour to SNP, and didn't resign his seat and offer himself for re-election. The man is a complete scumbag, renowned for his dubious business dealings and personal matters. That I am denied unfettered access to the tools of my trade by the likes of him speaks volumes about our SNP controlled society.
I think this fettering goes back a lot further than any SNP administration. It was going on back when you supported it, before you "jumped ship" as you put it. Who was in power then?
Jasbar wrote:
4. When the 1982 act came in we have less than 200 PH in Edinburgh. We now have over 1000. At a whim, a company like ECPH, who have just won control of the airport, can put on another 50 cars. They have already done this. That's around another 100 ill-trained, exploitable drivers, taking work away from professionally trained cabbies.
Well here's a plan Jas.
Get your Tory mates at Westminster to do something about the disgraceful bogus self-employed scam. There would be no real advantage trying to exploiting real employees with rights. ECPH and others would soon go broke trying to pay these guys even minimum wage with sick pay, national insurance and paid holiday entitlement. A decent entry standard for drivers wouldn't go amiss either.
Problem there is
every unionist party wants to strip people of their rights, none more so than those nice Tories nobody up here votes for or wants. They'd make the sick, the disabled and the unemployed work for them
gratis FFS.
Jasbar wrote:
5. I don't want PH drivers access to the tools of their trade fettered. But I don't want mine either. The fare paying public should decide, not controlling interests in the SNP. I believe the public will choose wisely.
I agree, the public should decide but without a level playing field, that isn't going to work and you know it. As long as part of the trade can exploit people with impunity, they will drive out the rest.
Jasbar wrote:
6. I'm amazed you didn't recognise the need to defend against my denigration of the scumbags in your party. very curious.
I have no party. If I tell you this often enough, do you think it might actually stick?
I therefore have no need to defend anyone, scumbag or other wise. I also think all politicians are scumbags to a greater or lesser degree. It goes with the territory.