Artur and molshy wrote:
The only reason ECPH have got to where they are is because the majority of the members of both companies are blinkered by their hatred for private hire. Some of those who shout the loudest against them actually operate private hire licences themselves. You couldn't make it up. Central and City should now and have been operating their own branch of private hire. Could have easily dealt with competition from rivals. Now if City Cabs were to acquire ECPH that certainly would be a game changer.
The only reason they got to where they are is because of the council's protection racker. Restriction, end of.
PH increased because it has no limits. Increases in demand were met by them before the taxi trade could get round to holding a survey. Remember them putting 50 skodas on in one go?
And reaching critical mass, PH has now reached the point where it is calling the shots. It determines price levels. It determines who gets access to the big contracts. And it uses the threat of price competition to lower tendered prices for the big contracts it doesn't get, really want, or are not yet ready to service.
And its the cabbniggrs who pay for it all. Reducing number of jobs because the economy is in the basement or because it causes customers to realise how the taxi trade is ripping them off while the service is poor, all means that its drivers who carry the financial cost.
I guess you must be wetting yourself that the council might just wake up to how its restriction has mitigated against the interests of customers and end the injustice of protecting existing owners who depend on the cabbniggrs it's created to prop up owners.
Only in the taxi trade ...