Sussex wrote:
gusmac wrote:
TBH Sussex, I don't see how your anti-restriction views can sit comfortably with your views on this.
Surely the bus company should have a right to compete in a free market, just as we should have?
Well I do.
There is a massive difference between wanting open access to everyone who is 'fit and proper' to operate a 'fit and proper' vehicle, and not wanting customers to go elsewhere for their home bound services.
And is it a free market when buses are subsidised by the council, the fuel is subsidised by the government, and it appears the buses are being protected for free by the police?
Hmm some on here would consider phoning a PH as going elsewhere.
The police, it could be argued, are protecting the public from each other.
Is it a free market when entry standards for PH are lower than HC?
Sounds as though you're arguing for wider restriction, not a free market. The observation about the vulnerable young lady sounds like something I'd have expected from Edinburgh, and TBA I'd have thought she'd be more at risk walking home or going in some illegal taxi?
I'll give you the argument about fuel and subsidies. If anyone should be subbing these buses, it should be the same people creating the problem - pubs and clubs - not the rest of us.