Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 11:09 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 6:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
toots wrote:
Grandad wrote:
But by citing irrelevant situations just makes the people making the comments look stupid. IMO


Irrelevant :?

Yes irrelevant. Citing rapes committed by licensed drivers when arguing against allowing unlicensed people to drive a car is irrelevant.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
grandad wrote:
Yes irrelevant. Citing rapes committed by licensed drivers when arguing against allowing unlicensed people to drive a car is irrelevant.


It is reasonable to suggest that what will happen is that PH drivers will source the most lax licensing regimes - where they are able to obtain operators licenses that are issued to another district.

The act still doesn't give an LA the power to stop a vehicle they don't license.

Anyone is now able to drive that vehicle whist it is off duty.

Considering all of the above - considering a licensing officer from Rutland will never be seen working in Manchester do you honestly think the situation will be better.

Incidentally, with reference to the millions of pounds of savings you can now as a PH operator benefit from non licensed spouses driving licensed vehicles - I think the law should be changed to allow you to marry a new wife for every PHV you own :wink:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
captain cab wrote:

Anyone is now able to drive that vehicle whist it is off duty.

Maybe the people campaigning for this not to be the case could modify their position and lobby for it to be just spouses and legal partners that can drive a PH when off duty and not for anyone to drive.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
grandad wrote:
Maybe the people campaigning for this not to be the case could modify their position and lobby for it to be just spouses and legal partners that can drive a PH when off duty and not for anyone to drive.


I'd like to see the law makers phrase that into law - it would be a job and a half :shock:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
grandad wrote:
toots wrote:
Grandad wrote:
But by citing irrelevant situations just makes the people making the comments look stupid. IMO


Irrelevant :?

Yes irrelevant. Citing rapes committed by licensed drivers when arguing against allowing unlicensed people to drive a car is irrelevant.


Ah I understand now, for a moment I thought you was talking about the real risk of rape by unlicensed drivers :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 484 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group