grandad wrote:
This is what the judge said in his summing up. Maybe he has it wrong then.
"A woman clearly does not have the capacity to make a choice if she is completely unconscious through the effects of drink and drugs, but there are various stages of consciousness, from being wide awake to dim awareness of reality. In a state of dim and drunken awareness you may, or may not, be in a condition to make choices. So you will need to consider the evidence of the complainant's state and decide these two questions: was she in a condition in which she was capable of making any choice one way or another? If you are sure that she was not, then she did not consent. If, on the other hand, you conclude that she chose to agree to sexual intercourse, or may have done, then you must find the defendants not guilty."
She had cocaine and cannabis in her system also along with the alcohol which one are you going for??
Wash that sand out of your fanny Gloria.
He's innocent and will be proven innocent in a few weeks time when its all been overturned and the lying slag is brought to book over it.
I'll reiterate my earlier question, do you know anyone who's been falsely accused of rape??
I don't know anyone who has been accuse of rape, falsely or otherwise. The only way that you can possibly know that he is innocent is if you were one of the other people who was present and you took a measure of her alcohol level at the time.
Now are you going to have a go at answering my question to you. How drunk does someone need to be before they are not capable of giving consent?