Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 4:08 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Mansfield gaz wrote:
Cheers guys, well had a call off the assessor today £10,000 to repair so it's looking like its a total loss, I was supposed to get my replacement loan taxi today but the donut brought down a blue cab instead of a black one that Mdc require so now I have to wait until next Monday before Mdc's testing station can fit another one in, its all fun and games this is :evil: :evil: :evil:


Keep a record of all out of pocket losses

Can you rent a cab on an invoice till your reseated in one of your own?

Didnt you get whiplash?.....didnt it come on later?

Have you legal protection?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 9:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:

Didnt you get whiplash?.....didnt it come on later?


I did mention the head injury, you can see where his head hit the windscreen.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 1:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Be careful with these lease hire scheme cabs these non fault accident companies supply.

I've heard of several cases where the 3rd parties insurance refuse to cover the costs as it was shown the injured party could have rented a similar taxi from other garages for £230 a week, not a day!

Back in 2011 the same happened to me, total rental costs for 9 weeks lease hire, and the repair of my wing and bumper were billed to the offenders insurance company for .. wait for it ... £16000!!

They refused, and the garage (and lease hire company-same premises) had to accept a much smaller amount around the £8k mark.

BUT ....... they could have then tried to extract the shortfall from my insurance .... putting me back to square one and losing my no claims, the main reason I used the non fault company in the first place.



They didn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
Mansfield gaz wrote:
Hi all, so on the 31st of October I was travelling from clowne to cresswell on the a616 when a black Clio came in the opposite direction scraped along the side of an mgzr in front of me then ploughed staring into the front of my e7,
She blew a positive breath test and got arrested and taken to hospital, now here is the problem my e7 is a 2008 with 240k on the clock so probably market value of £6000 if it gets wrote off I need a taxi that is no older than one year otherwise Mdc won't plate it so where do you guys think I stand on this? I had a perfectly good working taxi before the accident now I may be jobless.


I have had a look around and it appears Mansfield saloons can be replaced with vehicles up to 4 years old, so there policy seems very unreasonable, I have also noticed that they have licensed vehicles well over the age limit, so this sets a precedent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
mancityfan wrote:
Mansfield gaz wrote:
Hi all, so on the 31st of October I was travelling from clowne to cresswell on the a616 when a black Clio came in the opposite direction scraped along the side of an mgzr in front of me then ploughed staring into the front of my e7,
She blew a positive breath test and got arrested and taken to hospital, now here is the problem my e7 is a 2008 with 240k on the clock so probably market value of £6000 if it gets wrote off I need a taxi that is no older than one year otherwise Mdc won't plate it so where do you guys think I stand on this? I had a perfectly good working taxi before the accident now I may be jobless.


I have had a look around and it appears Mansfield saloons can be replaced with vehicles up to 4 years old, so there policy seems very unreasonable, I have also noticed that they have licensed vehicles well over the age limit, so this sets a precedent.


How is a 1st plate afe limit of 4 years unreasonable? we have that and hacks on 55 plates, the legislation is clear

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Admin, is TT on his final warning yet?


if not why not?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
wannabeeahack wrote:
mancityfan wrote:
Mansfield gaz wrote:
Hi all, so on the 31st of October I was travelling from clowne to cresswell on the a616 when a black Clio came in the opposite direction scraped along the side of an mgzr in front of me then ploughed staring into the front of my e7,
She blew a positive breath test and got arrested and taken to hospital, now here is the problem my e7 is a 2008 with 240k on the clock so probably market value of £6000 if it gets wrote off I need a taxi that is no older than one year otherwise Mdc won't plate it so where do you guys think I stand on this? I had a perfectly good working taxi before the accident now I may be jobless.


I have had a look around and it appears Mansfield saloons can be replaced with vehicles up to 4 years old, so there policy seems very unreasonable, I have also noticed that they have licensed vehicles well over the age limit, so this sets a precedent.


How is a 1st plate afe limit of 4 years unreasonable? we have that and hacks on 55 plates, the legislation is clear


From reading up it seems all w/c friendly have to be less than 1 year old, where saloon vehicles had to be less than 4 years old, so it seems to me to be unfair, and when they replace there vehicles the same applies.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
wannabeeahack wrote:
Admin, is TT on his final warning yet?


if not why not?

Well I hope not,he's the only Arsenal fan on here,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
trotskys twin wrote:
Mansfield otherwise known as SCABSVILLE :badgrin: :badgrin: full of poxy ex UDM trash :badgrin: :badgrin:

no doubt your in a Union mush who will of course take this up on your behalf and save you plenty of AGG????????????????

NO!!!!!!!! THERES A SURPRISE SO YER GET SHAFTED :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: SERVES YER RIGHT :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: =D> =D>


I know you refer to Mansfield, but don't you mean Nottinghamshire, this will then include them all, but a lot of miners in that area were still in the NUM, so you are being unfair to those miners.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 19, 2015 1:52 am
Posts: 19
There are 49 black and white vehicles (saloon) and will never be any more I think they have something called grandfather rights on them and when they need replacing it can be with a vehicle upto 4 years old as for the black cabs there is no cap on these but any new black cab which wants to be plated must be under 12 months old from date of registration once a Hackney is plated it can stay on for life as long as it keeps passing two safety tests a year as nidge stated earlier mansfield district council make the rules up as they go lol


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 5:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
mancityfan wrote:

From reading up it seems all w/c friendly have to be less than 1 year old, where saloon vehicles had to be less than 4 years old, so it seems to me to be unfair, and when they replace there vehicles the same applies.


Isnt that assabout face? surely they should ease off on WAV, here a "purpose built" (no mention of WAV) can be 10 years old for 1st plate saloons max at 1st plate is 4 years

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
Mansfield gaz wrote:
There are 49 black and white vehicles (saloon) and will never be any more I think they have something called grandfather rights on them and when they need replacing it can be with a vehicle upto 4 years old as for the black cabs there is no cap on these but any new black cab which wants to be plated must be under 12 months old from date of registration once a Hackney is plated it can stay on for life as long as it keeps passing two safety tests a year as nidge stated earlier mansfield district council make the rules up as they go lol


Then change the rules, get yourself an invite to the meetings, who do you know,
John Coxhead- Ace ABC. Cllr John Smart-Licensing Committee Chairman, George Ambler-123, Kevin Rowland 652’s spokesperson, Edwin Byron- Hackney Carriage representative, Geoff Lidgett- Mansfield Hackney Carriage Association,
Get what you want put on the agenda,I'm assuming the above are trade reps that go to these meetings, there's a meeting of the Quality Service Working Group Meeting - 10th November - 10AM - Council Chamber so you will have to be quick. It would seem like a good place to start, if you can get the reps on board the council will listen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
wannabeeahack wrote:
mancityfan wrote:

From reading up it seems all w/c friendly have to be less than 1 year old, where saloon vehicles had to be less than 4 years old, so it seems to me to be unfair, and when they replace there vehicles the same applies.


Isnt that assabout face? surely they should ease off on WAV, here a "purpose built" (no mention of WAV) can be 10 years old for 1st plate saloons max at 1st plate is 4 years


I agree, they should at least be the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
mancityfan wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
mancityfan wrote:

From reading up it seems all w/c friendly have to be less than 1 year old, where saloon vehicles had to be less than 4 years old, so it seems to me to be unfair, and when they replace there vehicles the same applies.


Isnt that assabout face? surely they should ease off on WAV, here a "purpose built" (no mention of WAV) can be 10 years old for 1st plate saloons max at 1st plate is 4 years


I agree, they should at least be the same.



This why we need a NATIONAL Standard instead of 600 plus local ones eusasmiles.zip

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
wannabeeahack wrote:
Admin, is TT on his final warning yet?


if not why not?

He hasn't posted on this thread, why you ask here? :-k

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 201 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group