Private Reggie wrote:
Uber control every aspect of the job, from receiving the request from the customer (sale) too the allocation of the job to the driver, they take the money direct from the customers bank account, they police their drivers using a sneaky customer rating system, they hire and fire (if you don't play their game) at will, they price surge based on lack of vehicles, not based on real time demand, they pay the driver a week in arrears, they're creating uber robots with no say/input in anything other than driving the car, they operate without limit of anything causing dilution of potential earnings but benefit hugely from that by raking 25% of every job, theirs nothing they don't control, they don't even take any kind of responsibility for anything connected to the journey, the whole business model is totally morally wrong, the judge got it bang on, it's a case of "Who do you think you are kidding Mr Uber".
Hopefully the drivers who are mostly mercenaries will jump on this opportunity to throw a claim in and give a really big boy a really big slap, hopefully showing all kinds of extreme capitalist's who are thinking of this kind of business model that the wee guy in the street is not just going to sit there and take it.
Their will be implications for most of the private hire industry no doubt but they too have grown way out of control, within the hack trade companies will probably have to look at not bieng seen to be treating their drivers and members as employees, rules, regulations, by-laws, articles of associations will have to be looked over and changed accordingly, drivers must now be seen to have some freedoms regardless.
Interesting times ahead for both trades but I can only see good coming from the bad that is creeping alarmingly throughout our trades.
good post!