ShirlEButt wrote:
J.D.
Please can you explain to me why you have such a patronising manner with people whom you do not even know, I admit my ignorance with regards to any postings made by "SEFTON CLOWN" as you call him or her, so not sure whether that remark is justified or not, but if your attitude is aimed at myself I am offended.
Firstly I did not post anything which was not true i.e. the letter which was received by approx 800 badge holders, even though in your follow up you said plate holders, oh dear was that a mistake made by you.
I expect you can obviously show me where I said, "plate holders" in my follow up? Butt what if you can't? Would that be another item you got wrong?
Perhaps there is more to you and the Sefton Clown than meets the eye? You haven't so far displayed any particular knowledge of the Trafford Taxi trade apart from what has been written in a council letter? I just wonder about you Shirley?
Did you post this? Quote:
JD
SORRY, BUT I DO NOT HAVE IT WRONG, I PERSONALLY RECEIVED A LETTER FROM TRAFFORD BOROUGH ALONG WITH APPROX 800 OTHER BADGE HOLDERS IN THE TRAFFORD AREA. SO I DO KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. MINSHULL STREET COULD ONLY RECOMMED NOT I REPEAT NOT ORDER TRAFFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL. THE ACTUAL WORDS USED WERE ASKING T.M.B.C. TO CONSIDER AGAIN I REPEAT CONSIDER. I DO GET ANNOYED WHEN PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT FROM THIS BOROUGH AND ARE NOT LICENCED FOR THIS BOROUGH THINK THEY HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS. Sad
FEEL BETTER NOW.
NO HARD FEELINGS
SHIRLEY
Well it would seem you certainly know what you are talking about Shirley but why the reference to "Feel better now, no hard feelings". Where you implying I had got something wrong and you had got something right? Or were you just being a little patronising?
I particular like your "insistence that the judge can only recommend" did this come straight out of the Shirley Butt book of administrative law? It is know doubt gratifying to read the solicitor for Trafford Mr Ian Veitch got it absolutely right and you got it absolutely wrong. Mr Veitch wrote,
The Judge "directed" that the matter be referred back to the Public Protection Regulatory Committee to consider the grant of the five Hackney Carriage Vehicle licences in accordance with established criteria. I take it you do understand what the Judge meant when he directed Trafford to go back and consider the grant of five licenses?
Can we now be assured that you now know a little more about the law than you perhaps do about the Trafford Taxi trade? I also suspect you won't now be advising your colleagues that a judge can only recommend? Perhaps you and the Sefton Clown should meet up, you seem to have a great deal in common.
Quote:
Secondly you state "I must have had an idea of my own making" when referring to the applicant not being granted his 5 licences, oh dear mistake number 2 where did I say that?
I never said you said that Shirley? If you read the post again it is obvious to everyone else on here that I never said you said that. What I did say is as follows.
From your comments it would "appear" you are saying the applicant didn't get his five licenses, where you get that information from I don't know? It can't be in the letter you received from the council so it must be an idea of your own making. I specifically said,
From your comments it "would appear" you are saying the applicant didn't get his five licences You do understand what appear means don't you?
You did state this did you not?
Quote:
"Well all those that were out and about banging the drums and beating their chests the battle is yet not won".
And this
Quote:
JD
SORRY, BUT I DO NOT HAVE IT WRONG, I PERSONALLY RECEIVED A LETTER FROM TRAFFORD BOROUGH ALONG WITH APPROX 800 OTHER BADGE HOLDERS IN THE TRAFFORD AREA. SO I DO KNOW WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT. MINSHULL STREET COULD ONLY RECOMMED NOT I REPEAT NOT ORDER TRAFFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL. THE ACTUAL WORDS USED WERE ASKING T.M.B.C. TO CONSIDER AGAIN I REPEAT CONSIDER. I DO GET ANNOYED WHEN PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT FROM THIS BOROUGH AND ARE NOT LICENCED FOR THIS BOROUGH THINK THEY HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS. Sad"
Anyone reading those comments would no doubt get the impression you doubted that the five licenses had "already" been granted in court? That was the impression you wished to convey wasn't it?
I take it you now have a problem with the queens English by the very fact you can't differentiate between something that might appear to be the case as against something that is the case?
It would appear you don't know the difference between something I suggest "might" be in your mind as against a categorical insistence that I explicitly said you stated it was in your mind?
I shall state it again just for your benefit.
From your comments it would "appear" you are saying the applicant didn't get his five licenses, where you get that information from I don't know? It can't be in the letter you received from the council, "so it must be an idea of your own making". Quote:
Again I repeat myself just like you do to children I only stated what was in the letter. With regards to my comment using the word recommend the most I am guilty of is repeating what I was told by an offical of T.M.B.C.
So now you say you consulted an official, how convenient? You then decide to come on TDO and state authoritatively that a judge can only recommend? Is that the sole basis of your argumentative points that you were lead by a third party who doesn't know their azz from their elbow and you were daft enough to put their comments into an authoritative statement on this forum? Are you now wiser from the fact that "you and he" got it completely wrong?
Quote:
Finally I do admire your intelligence because you are obviously quite an educated person, but your maths are not very good, 5 licences worth 175 grand equates to 35 grand each licence, well whoopeee do, where did you pull that figure from or was it an idea of your own making. The last licence to change hands in the Trafford Borough was 3 months ago which included a P reg Metro Cab and was transferred for the value of £22,000.
I have my doubts that you are even in Trafford Shirley, otherwise you would know who bought one of the last cab and plates to be sold in Trafford, it was quite unique but I suspect you don't know what the uniqueness is?
I know what it went for and so do most others in Trafford but I doubt that you know? You don't have to tell me the price it went for Shirley just the person it was sold to? If you can tell me I might give you a little credence but if you can't then I will know your full of chit.
Quote:
I had decided to keep shtum for the next couple of days and just wait for the outcome of Thursday's meeting.
Meaning you didn't have a clue about the Trafford report until I posted it. You're full of chit Shirley and like I said I think there is more to you than meets the eye.
Quote:
you are being a bit personal and in my opinion rather aggresive in your attitude, but ok thats only my opinion and you may not think its worth anything. But are we not missing something here, we all have the interests of the trade at heart, even though we may have different opinions, and different interpretations, but thats what makes the world go round.
I try to keep my comments to fact and what the law states Shirley, you and your like can look after the so-called Taxi trade. That is as long as the Trade doesn't impeach on the rights of every individual who doesn't happen to subscribe to what the trade has to offer.
You should remember that the Taxi trade is made up of individuals, those individuals have rights under the law, you have just experienced one such individual exercising that right in the face of adversity. You would do well to remember that the trade does not have a legal right to say who is granted a license.
JD