Heathcote wrote:
Most so called operators have been no better than uber, they have practised the same business model as them but shouted foul when they came on the scene. It was the same operators pursuing changes in operating laws that allowed the ubers to come on the scene. SELF destruction springs to mind.
Bang on.
Sussex wrote:
Should this mess be sorted within three months, or at least the arse end of it sorted, then I'm not sure it will be horrendously bad financially.
The 2008-10 financial mess was maybe on par with what a three month wipe out could lead to, and in time we all recovered from that, despite austerity.
I'm not so sure. Suspect the main restrictions will be lifted by the summer, but not so sure how long the effects on the economy will last. Could be years.
Of course, it depends on the location. Here we're very dependent on the students and university, and they're effectively shut down until September at the earliest. And overseas tourists and golfers won't be here in the summer either.
But mabye more domestic tourists once the hotels and guest houses open again, and people want to get out and about, but who knows?
As for the trade, suspect a few drivers won't be back, especially those near retirement, or semi-retired with pensions, or part-timers, blah, blah.
And I couldn't believe how quickly the ranks cleared here when it all kicked off. I'm suspecting a few drivers disappeared back 'home' overseas while they still could, so some of them could well never be back, but again, who knows?
On the other hand, with all the job losses elsewhere in the economy, there could be a queue of new drivers waiting to start once things settle down.
So I think some things will change, and the trade will be different, particularly if there's some movement on the self-employment thing.
But those predicting some kind of wider societal change are, I suspect, wide of the mark
