Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 3:28 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
TDO wrote:
Well it was actually two years, so can you only count to one or are you just trying to misrepresent people as usual?


What on earth are you going on about ................. I stated for more than one year, now correct me if I'm wrong but JD was unaware of the precise details for some time so I stated more than a year on the basis that it would have been some time to gather all the facts.

Appart from anything else 2 years is more than one year anyway, so my statement was not misleading although your interpretation of my statement was .......................... no change there then.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:02 pm 
i've told u all b4....a national strike is needed !!!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:53 pm
Posts: 108
Location: Brighton
tx_op wrote:
i've told u all b4....a national strike is needed !!!

And how many drivers will clear up at the ranks while the likes of us are on strike? :?

_________________
Unmet demand you're having a laugh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Since the last National Taxi Association meeting Wayne has been working with other National Taxi Associations and Taxi related unions to bring them together with the view of Working as a partnership, as you will appreciate the time and effort by Wayne to achieve this has been considerable, To actually bring together associations that for years have been at each other's throats deserves applause, and of course this has been done openly with real people and real names, :wink:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
To actually bring together associations that for years have been at each other's throats deserves applause, and of course this has been done openly with real people and real names, :wink:

I wish them well.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
To actually bring together associations that for years have been at each other's throats deserves applause, and of course this has been done openly with real people and real names, :wink:

I wish them well.


so do I

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
To actually bring together associations that for years have been at each other's throats deserves applause, and of course this has been done openly with real people and real names, :wink:

I wish them well.


so do I

Chance out of ten? :-k

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Up to now everyone that has been invited has excepted, and more want to attend .

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
Up to now everyone that has been invited has excepted, and more want to attend .

In my experience the more attending, the less that will be happening. 8-[

TBH I'm not sure there is a building big enough for all those egos. :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Up to now everyone that has been invited has excepted, and more want to attend .

In my experience the more attending, the less that will be happening. 8-[

TBH I'm not sure there is a building big enough for all those egos. :roll:


I don't know about that, I can remember being part of a meeting in Liverpool at the Pier Head, over 1000 drivers and cabs, all agreeing on one thing, and then making it happen.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
GA wrote:
Appart from anything else 2 years is more than one year anyway, so my statement was not misleading although your interpretation of my statement was .......................... no change there then.



OK, so you have a two-year-old child, someone asks it's age and you say "over a year".

Of course, if they knew the truth then they'd think you had rocks in your head.

Alternatively, that you're trying to mislead :shock:

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
TDO wrote:
GA wrote:
Appart from anything else 2 years is more than one year anyway, so my statement was not misleading although your interpretation of my statement was .......................... no change there then.



OK, so you have a two-year-old child, someone asks it's age and you say "over a year".

Of course, if they knew the truth then they'd think you had rocks in your head.

Alternatively, that you're trying to mislead :shock:


LOL what an insane argument that is .................. and after making it people should be questioning whether you have rocks in your head.

B. Lucky :roll:

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Well I'm quite sure one of us has rocks in our head, and I know who my money's on ](*,)

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
I don't know about that, I can remember being part of a meeting in Liverpool at the Pier Head, over 1000 drivers and cabs, all agreeing on one thing, and then making it happen.

Massive difference between that situation and the one at hand. There, I assume, a proposal was put before the lads, they either accepted it, or they didn't. That proposal was devised by a few lads.

The meeting of the current 'great and good' is a completely different ball game. There, even if they agree to something at the meeting, they will then have to report back to the lads. And changes will be requested by some, which will then have to be put back to the 'great and good'. Hence the fewer the better.

Else proposals will be have to be watered down to a point where they end up to be nothing of substance. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
GA wrote:
Passing the buck again JD.


Not passing the buck my friend but correcting your false allegation that it was me who brought about the current Wav policy in Carlisle.

Quote:
Your insistance that the situation at the station rank, intended to increase number of WAV's whilst retaining choice for drivers, was illegal and the fact that you phoned Carlisle City Council to point out that fact, had nothing to do with the council taking the decision they did.


Like I said, only a fool would make such a remark considering Carlisle's Wav policy was already in place before I even enquired about the rank situation. Therefore its no wonder your wild inaccurate and untrue allegation gets the derision it deserves. Perhaps you can now see why some of us totally ignore your distorted ramblings?

Quote:
The condition was unchallenged and only rarely questioned until you stuck your nose in claiming to be the saviour of the saloon trade in Carlisle,


I'm not remotely concerned at why the condition went unchallenged, as far as myself and the courts are concerned the condition is illegal and the sooner it is challenged in a court of law the better. We can't have councillors setting illegal conditions and that's the top and bottom of it.

Quote:
your witch-hunt against Wayne Casey caused this action by the council and the implications of taking advise from you are to be clearly seen by this decision.


I think Wayne Casey has a broad enough back to answer for himself any questions I might have raised against him, the NTA or the Carlisle Taxi association, in respect of any involvement in this rank business?

Quote:
You can try and discredit me, or claim that I'm "not the sharpest knife in the draw" but using the example you did does more to question you than me. To any sane person anyway.


Every time you open your mouth you discredit yourself with the rubbish that comes out and I doubt that will ever change. Your stock in trade is making wild and unscrupulous allegations that you know to be untrue. Therefore I don't need to remind everyone that you're a peddler of intentional misinformation and anything you say must be treated with extreme caution.

I'll let you apologise now, for accusing me of being the catalyst of Carlisle council's Wav policy.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 700 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group